FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hello again! I had a question regarding if it would be permissible for Fandom staff to run a interwiki bot have DE links added? For visual demonstration, it would be like this.

    Awaiting your reply, thank you!

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • We should already have interlanguage functionality on this wiki. If there are articles missing the interwiki links, feel free to add them.

        Loading editor
    • Gotcha! Thank you! I'll let staff know of your approval. If you notice any problems or change your mind, you are welcome to poke me or MtaÄ. :)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • typo yes.

    as for "mega", what I think probably happened there is they used find and replace to change "perfect" to ultimate, and then later used find and replace again to change "ultimate" to "mega". cuz thats the only way I can see them somehow changing "perfect" to "mega" in digitamamons profile.

    also that profile is outright BS anyway lmao. "digitamamon cannot digivolve", except the fact that devitamamon exists, titamon was made as his mega alongside Ogremon, and then minervamon from that one vjump page.

    also all the filler stuff from games and vpets.

      Loading editor
  • Hello. I know this is a long shot, but I was wondering if you have the following Digimon cards and would be willing to sell/trade any. If I'm bothering you, please let me know and I will leave you alone. I just didn't know anywhere else to look. Any help at all would be appreciated.

    Digimon CCG generations set- Beowolfmon dm-175 (gold text) Fanglongmon dm-179 (gold text) promos- Goldramon dmp-001 (holo?)

    D-Tector Series 2 Agunimon (silver text) Series 3 Beetlemon (silver text), ancientgarurumon (silver text),

    Not sure if the next ones exist 160, 161, 162, 171,172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 184, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 195,197,198, 199,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209, 210

    Holographic Series 1 1,2,3,8,13,18,20,26 Holographic Series 2 33,41,44,45,48,49,52,53,54,55,63,64, Holographic Series 3 87,88,89,91,94,95,96,97,98,99,102,106,107,108,109,110,113, toy exclusives 24, 25, 56, 62

    any D-Cyber cards you might be willing to part with. Thanks again for taking the time and once again sorry if I bothered you. Thanks.

      Loading editor
  • I mean do they like each other or R they just good friends?

      Loading editor
  • the heavyleomon profile from rearise seems to mention a leo species (or leomon family seems to be the term used). if you can verify this we can get a page made

      Loading editor
    • I put the japanese in a hidden comment on the page

        Loading editor
    • It's a separate kanji which refers to clans or tribes. It's the same kanji used for the five clades in Crusader, as shown in Aegiochusmon's profile.

      It's also used on Sagittarimon's profile, and to refer to Leomon's Ancestral Cave (lit. "Ruins of the Leomon Clan"). It's similar to the -species groupings, but is broader in sense.

        Loading editor
    • what term should we use for that? I feel like "troupe" probably wouldn't fit in terms of this leomon group. I guess "Clan" would make sense based on that ancestral cave

      sagitarrimon uses "family" which seemed to be the "best" I could find for what the translation could be

        Loading editor
    • tribe is what I was using when I did the relevant translations.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, a few of my edits were reverted again (no surprise), so I want to be blocked, that way, the rest of you guys don’t have to worry about me making any more mistakes & I can no longer feel guilty about it & so I can still look at & enjoy the website. I’m sure this probably doesn’t make sense to you, but I have Autism, so nothin that I say ever makes sense to anyone anyway. Thanks.

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • Everything causes anxiety for me to be honest, but if you insist, I’ll be back again in a couple weeks with a final decision.

        Loading editor
    • No worries, dude, you're a valued editor. I can give you a one month wellness suspension as you requested.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I love that picture with ophanimon and Laylamon
    Digimon Twitter 2019-09-30 b
      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • We can upload the twitter art as Xmon b 2.jpg, that's fine. But the DRB art remains the primary.

        Loading editor
    • I Guess not, since Chimera deleted

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • how do we treat cross-overs in regards to appearances in other games etc? tai and agumon have now appeared in a cross over in the The Idolmaster Cinderella Girls: Starlight Stage mobile game. like... tai and agumon themselves:

    https://twitter.com/_mikarashis/status/1230734353291833344

    I believe this first he first time a digimon character has cross over into another series' video game.

    also its a bandai game, which is super relevant and basically makes this canon. (probably).

      Loading editor
    • View all 14 replies
    • i think the ones that count as in actual canon should be put into relevant articles and what not a part of actual canon for digimon, compared to just real life cross overs. EG, the Miku stuff isnt canon to digimon as a "story" or "continiuty" or whatever because it was a real life thing.

      lili however, and the tekken universe, is outright canon to re:digitize (also note that tekken itself takes place in the same universe as street figther), meanwhile this idol game is now canon to adventure (in regards to the game existing in adventure at least, followed by tai and agumon being sucked in). digimon collectors with cards for summon night characters i feel like wouldn't count as canon storyline wise, same for the battle spirit card game.

      so I think we should try to treat it as in universe (tekken, idol game, etc), and real life stuff (miku, kumamon, hello kitty)

        Loading editor
    • To be fair, Monster Hunter's Collaborations article covers both in-universe and real life stuff hence why I suggested that as the approach we should consider.

      It does not make the distinction of is and is not "canon" cause you have at least two continuities, main line and Frontier, not counting spin-offs like Stories and Explore which may exist outside of those two continuities.

      Like I get why you want to focus on canon but that isn't really helpful cause the franchise itself doesn't make that distinction.

      And by the by Tekken and Street Fighter have not been confirmed to share the same universe, their universes may have just intersected at one time with Akuma being able to cross between them. Think how Geralt and Moogle crossed into the Monster Hunter universe, resulting in them being in the New World during the events of MH World.

      To quote the end of this video discussing the matter of Tekken and Stree Fighter possibly sharing the same universe, "They may not be connected, but they do cross": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UklUU8bereU

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Okay, if edit warring is such a bad thing, lets discuss this here.

    I really don't see what Flamedramon or Raidramon have to do with that page at all or why you felt the need to bring them up, but I once again insist that the Cursed Breath talked about in the Digimon Data Collection is mot referencing the Dark Shot attack in any way.

      Loading editor
    • View all 9 replies
    • one example where bandai dubbers were idiots and used the name of one attack for another is reppamon. previous games used the dub name "Razor Wind" for "Shinkū Kamaitachi". then cyber sleuth came in and reppamon's attack was known as "razor wind". unaware players (including me at first) looking at reppamon's page (and also the game) would assume that means the attack in japanese was "Shinkū Kamaitachi", to match previous localisations, however that was not the case, and instead the dubbers ended up naming "Kurukuru Rekkūzan" as "Razor Wind" (previously localised as rolling tackle). this straight up threw me off when I was looking at the cyber sleuth localised names. the dubbers knew reppamon had a attack dubbed as "razor wind", and just didnt care what attack this was attached to when it came to cyber sleuth. in fact, the attack animation is very clearly "Kurukuru Rekkūzan" as well, so this was just them not caring.

      MetalGarurumon LMAO. every other game/anime switches which attack is dubbed as which and that shit gave me a headache when I went over it to double check lmfao. like, hes had a ridiculous history.

      then there was the laziness of hackers memory. alphamon had "Ouryūken", which was dubbed as "Blade of the Dragon King". that's all fine and dandy, but then HM removed "Ouryūken" (as Alphamon O was now playable), and gave alphamon Seiken Gradalpha as replacement. the dubbers were too lazy to change the attack name, so this was dubbed as "Blade of the Dragon King", even tho that makes no sense (with Blade of the Dragon King being a translation of Ouryuken). to make matters worse, his in game profile DID use the name "seiken gradalpha" meaning the dub of HM gave the attack two different names.

      dubbers are known for being dumbasses when it comes to this stuff.

        Loading editor
    • Reppamon would be the Raidramon scenario. Rayven is positing that the dub decided to replace the discussion entirely to take about a separate attack, which I can see justification in.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • How is someone spreading completely incorrect information about someone elses fan character somehow fanfiction?

    Yeah someone back in the day started a hoax about the character, you know it is a hoax yet for some reason want to preserve the misinformation instead of simply updating it to reflect the actual reality of the fan created version.

    Why you'd want to preserve some rumour people spread about the person who owned the character is beyond me. We both know the information is incorrect.

      Loading editor
    • "to reflect the actual reality of the fan created version."

      There isn't one. The fanfiction on the acidrenamon page is on a meta-level, like Ben Drowned. They're making up their own story about acidrenamon in the real world. There's no "misinformation" being preserved, because the Fan: articles are by definition non-canonical fan opinions and creations -- the article itself is fiction. They are not meant to be taken as reliable in any way, and they exist solely to allow editors and visitors to blow off steam by making fiction.

      You misunderstanding that, and choosing to sling around accusations of malice against the editor who wrote the article, and imputing bad faith on the part of the staff is pretty irresponsible.

      If you would like to create a separate page for the "real" AcidRenamon, you may. If you would like to help build the current article based on what KimeramonRocks started, you may. But slashing and burning someone else's fan fiction because you don't like it is not okay.

        Loading editor
    • I did not mean to imply bad faith and I apologize, nor malice on the part of the one who originally made the article.

      It was a hoax started off this site to discredit the maker, I’m not claiming the op knew this and probably should’ve been clearer about that but that is in essence where it originated and why I acted how I did, however I recognize I acted to rashly and should have contacted you first to ask clarification.

      It just seems a bit tasteless, but I guess I was in the wrong to edit it once it was already moved into the Fan category. And I apologize for that.

        Loading editor
    • If you'd like to contact KimeramonRocks and explain your interpretation of the situation to him, more power to you. I'm just interacting in this as an admin, and our policy has been to let editors use the Fan: space essentially as their own writing pad -- as long as they're not somehow doing something illegal, they can claim that Digimon was invented by GameFreak in 1875, and they would be allowed to.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.