I personally love Digimon Tri, but I see that a lot of people REALLY hate it. So, why do you like or hate Digimon Tri?
Also, I consider the dub of Digimon Fusion to be one of the best Digimon shows, so maybe I just have weird opinions?
Oh well.
I personally love Digimon Tri, but I see that a lot of people REALLY hate it. So, why do you like or hate Digimon Tri?
Also, I consider the dub of Digimon Fusion to be one of the best Digimon shows, so maybe I just have weird opinions?
Oh well.
I haven't seen it but I have heard enough about it to put me off from wanting to watch it or accept it as canon.
Disclaimer: Whatever I say here I will not hate on you for loving Tri, and plus I'm with you on Fusion. It's my third favorite Digimon series after Tamers and Adventure 01, and the others below aren't close. (And as for dub-exclusive, I always go by dubs and I am all for them censoring suggestive content)
For one, I hear the Digidestined act out of character in Tri.
Second, one thing I adore about Digimon is battles to the death against evil villains who are satisfying to see spectacularly go down. (I always had an interest in that kind of villain defeat due to watching Sailor Moon at a young age) Devimon, Etemon, Myotismon, the Dark Masters, Apocalymon, D-Reaper, Lucemon, Kurata, Lord Bagra, and sounds like Millenniumon and Negamon will follow.
But it sounds like, of the two "villains", one of them (King Drasil) gets off, and the other (Meicoomon), while dying, isn't so much evil as... either corrupted or unable to control her power, I can't remember which. Kinda like Kokomon in the Digimon: The Movie third segment. That makes it feel less fun to watch the battle and sad rather than satisfied to see her die.
Third, similar to the above point, it revives all the dead villains (likely excluding Diaboromon) and only re-kills MetalSeadramon and Machinedramon. Meaning, in Tri canon, Devimon, Etemon, Myotismon, Puppetmon, Piedmon, and Apocalymon live forever. It's one thing for a 2010's anime to not kill off any real villains (well, except two). It's another to undo what I loved most about Adventure 01. (Dragonball Super repeats this with one villain, but its most evil - Frieza!)
I go by Adventure 01 as a pure standalone timeline, Adventure 02 as a parallel timeline where similar events took place in the past (but different in some ways, as they would have to be due to Machinedramon with the whole Millenniumon thing), and Tri... I just ignore entirely. (No offense, plus I myself didn't mind the Star Wars sequel trilogy but still go by them as a separate universe from the first six films)
That's my reasoning, I know no one else is into that whole villain defeat thing like I am. Maybe I just have weird opinions too?
What do you think?