Thread:KrytenKoro/@comment-29650373-20191123044544/@comment-134861-20191126135907

"With all due respect you have not done."

I did answer to it. Not to your satisfaction, sure, but it was answered correctly.

"JAQing? What does that mean? I have never heard that term."

Then Google it.

"I agree with that."

Then stop navel-gazing.

" for what specifically? With all due respect."

For the same thing as every other time, as indicated in the original edit summary.

"It sounds like you are threatening me for daring to ask for understanding about something."

No, I'm threatening you with a block for evading bans, bad-faith arguing and JAQing, and tendentious editing.

Your questions here aren't aimed at "understanding", or else you'd be (1) carrying the burden of proof, (2) not forcing your edits back through the second you think the staff aren't paying attention, and (3) actually listening to the answers given even if they're not in the form you want. I explained what was wrong with your edits several times, and instead of trying to improve your edits, you wheedled and quibbled and tried to push me into practically writing an essay to defend reverting your edits, or do your googling and research for you, when that's not how this works. (You want a dictionary that gives the same vagueness to "strength"? Pick one. They all do, as I already stated. Demanding that I give you a comprehensive list is a bad faith waste of time when it's already been established that neither word is ideal in this regard. You want to know what "JAQing" means? Try to look it up yourself first.) It wastes everyone's time, and the wiki community does not owe you it's time. It has a task to work on.

It is your job to defend your edits. Not the community's job to defend saying they're not good enough. If you weren't clearly, constantly operating in bad faith, sure, the community would be willing to occasionally do some of the work for you sprucing up your edits, explaining phrases you're unfamiliar with, or walking you through the path of improving your edits. But the clearly evident fact that you constantly ask these questions and make these comments not because you want to improve, but because you want to prolong the debate is why none of us have patience for you -- because you're making it all a waste of time and effort.