User talk:Blazing Chaos

Nice to see you around here, B.C. I thought you were too busy. Digi9346 09:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh, I'm still very busy regardless. Just got a periodic break. Chapter 29 is already over 3000 words, by the way, and I haven't even got to the first main event that's due to happen. With the preview too, this is going to be a whopper of a chapter. Nonetheless, begrudgingly I admit that exams come first... --Blazing Chaos 14:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL. Poor you. How many words do you think Chapter 29 is going to hit? - Digi9346 15:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * As many as it needs to complete the events I have planned, which includes a battle. I'd say that 10000+ isn't unlikely. --Blazing Chaos 15:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Whoa. Long chapy. How about I update your DigimonWiki user page for you? - Digi9346 15:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * If you wish. Perhaps this conversation could be transferred to emails? :) --Blazing Chaos 15:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Question
Just a question, from seeing your user page - what about Jurato bugs you, and how the heck did you come up with "Junri"? I can kind of understand the first, since their is hints of something between Takato and Rika in the series, but I honestly can't figure out where the second comes from.KrytenKoro 05:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It never really felt to me that there was anything behind Jurato beyond a simple crush, and I know from experience that few crushes actually work out. --Blazing Chaos 08:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Character v. Species Infoboxes
Partners should probably only be on the character infobox, since it is not so relevant in the species article, though I can see reasons for having it there. (Such as if a reader is interested in what kind of tamers have had a Biyomon)

Voice Actors, however, is definitely appropriate to both pages, as the species article would also cover Biyomon's that did not appear as partner's or major characters - like in Frontier.

Type, Family, and Attribute should be included on both, if those stats have been verified for both. Most of these statistics are based off of versions of the Digimon from the cards or games, and there is ample evidence of some partner Digimon having different stats from the species. However, this data is also generally confirmed from the Analyzer screens or readings, so it should be possible to add. I actually had/have a document translating all the analyzer screens, so we could add the known info for that.

The odd redirects are due to wikipedia simply listing the characters as Biyomon, instead of Biyomon (Adventure), something which has always annoyed me and that we're working on fixing. Rerouting it to the list article, or simply copy-pasting the info from the list article and creating a new "Birdramon" article would actually be really helpful.

The "Level" bit is covered by a category on the species article, and is amply covered on the character article, though now that we're re-splitting articles we should have a space for it in the infobox, for species articles.

The list style of digivolution - are you talking about that in the infobox, or the digimon included on the page? For the first, "Digivolves to/from" is the best we can do, because almost no Digimon have "absolutely stable" digivolution lines - even Agumon can digivolve to five or so different Champion's, and GeoGreymon can canonically digivolve from both original and New Agumon. Same for the second.KrytenKoro 22:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I did mention that Partners would be best suited on the character page mainly, although I can see your point too. To be honest, what's wrong with simply noting any discrepancies between species versions?


 * I still think that putting the level details in infoboxes is a good idea. Seems a bit pointless lacking it for some reason and just assuming that it's clear enough for the text. In a situation like this, I'd say that duplication in some cases would be better than no info in some cases.


 * I suppose there are some situations where digivolution lines are too cloudy, but again I have to mention how simply including all of the permutations would, in most cases (and I stress 'most', there are probably one or two digimon who can digivolve/dedigivolve to a dozen or more alternatives), separated by slashes, make wiki navigation a lot easier and save a fair bit of browsing time.


 * Out of curiosity, why have we started replying to talk page comments on the commenters page instead of the (in my opinion far more logical) usual system of simply adding replies below? It's got to be baffling for anyone reading a talk page to see how a discussion progresses when it just vanishes.


 * Cheers, --Blazing Chaos 22:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC)