Template talk:Appmon Infobox

Attribute vs Type
According to Ainz on Wikimon, what we're calling "Type" uses the same kanji as what is used for the Digimon parameter Attribute and functionally there's no difference other than the number and nature of the Attributes in question (three Attributes based on file types vs seven Attributes based on the genre that the app they are based on belongs to). Do we use wanna use Type or go with Attribute like Wikimon has decided to do? Chimera-gui (talk) 01:30, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * I used "Type" because the anime used the English term "Type". Lanate (talk) 01:38, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, does anyone else think that it might be a good idea to discuss the matter with Wikimon then? This way we don't have conflicting terms for the same trait. Chimera-gui (talk) 02:33, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * They can continue to use "Attribute"; it's not incorrect and does identify the similar concept. We might also run into issues with a Digimon's Type and Appmon's Type since Digimon Type is more like Appmon's Appli and the Digimon's Attribute is more like Appmon's Type. Lanate (talk) 02:57, October 2, 2016 (UTC)

Categories
Just hit a small roadblock related to something I also found annoying on the Digimon side. Navimon is a Navi-type and Navi-appli Appmon. I want to separate the two of them into separate categories; is this something we should do? Lanate (talk) 04:37, October 2, 2016 (UTC) Are there any Apps that get used for more than one Appmon? Cause can't think of a single one off the top of my head. Chimera-gui (talk) 06:24, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I don't think Appli/Apps should even have categories since unlike Digimon Types which can get applied to multiple species, each is based on a specific Application the Apps themselves are most likely single use only as the basis for an Appmon. Even DoGatchmon uses Super Search rather than just Search which I'd expect if we went by Digimon classification rules.