Fan talk:Digimon Cinematic Sagas

Room for Improvement
I like this idea, but symbolism and themes need to be worked on. The Chaotic Masters honestly should have been called the Four Horsemen in my opinion due to their relationship with Apocalymon. Such overarching themes will ties the stories together easily. --101Dalmatians (talk) 00:13, August 28, 2015 (UTC)101Dalmatians
 * You mean like, Four Horsemen of Apocalypse. I don't think they should have a name without it literally being true. Word "Horsemen" sounds better if they would have mounts. And MetalSeadramon and Machinedramon are large enough to move on their own, while Piemon can simply levitate his own body. But you have a point, perhaps their connection to Apocalymon would have also worked better if it would have been hinted earlier than in the ending of Digitaclysm – Part 1. I chose the name "Chaotic Masters" to replace the "Dark Masters" of "Masters of Darkness", since only Piemon is truly a representative of demonic kind. CAJH (talk) 08:09, August 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * I thought more about themes of one saga, instead of one film. That indeed sounds like a mistake. But I really have been considering what would be a main theme for each film this far: First Adventure is about the DigiDestined being introduced to their powers and the Digimon fully appearing in the real world for the first time. Network Battles a typical film with an opponent for the protagonists who tries to replace them as heroes of the world, but they either have ulterior motives or they are manipulated by the real main antagonist. The Third World seems like it only presents a new world which is used as a weapon to cause imbalance that remains even after defeating the one made it happen. Digitaclysm takes the events of the third film even further and finally explains the connection between every other crisis this far as well as hinting how the humanity caused the imperfection of the Digital World through its own imperfection. CAJH (talk) 08:41, August 28, 2015 (UTC)