Talk:Digimon Wiki/FA Talk 2010

February 27, 2010: Impmon (Tamers)
Impmon (Tamers) is a clear winner with three votes. THB  → Talk ← 17:40, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Cyberdramon (Tamers)? Looks pretty good to me. Rad140 I praise myself on being the last one to post in all three of our forums. (Message) 23:39, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Cyberdramon (Tamers) was already the featured article on October 5, 2009 -- Good intetions have created some of the biggest disasters and most horrid things to have ever exsisted 01:19, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay. That's why it seemed familiar.
 * Comment: Now that you mention it, should we have a set time after which we're allowed to put up the same featured article again, say, a year? I just don't think it would be fair if we could never display the same featured article ever again. THB  → Talk ← 14:14, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Well I'd be fine with that, but just keep in mind that doing that could lead to the same articles getting featured article status all the time with fewer new featured articles -- Good intetions have created some of the biggest disasters and most horrid things to have ever exsisted 20:36, February 22, 2010 (UTC)

How about Impmon (Tamers) instead... -- Good intetions have created some of the biggest disasters and most horrid things to have ever exsisted 01:26, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I second Impmon tamers 24.77.146.160 17:25, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll third it. Looks good. Rad140 I praise myself on being the last one to post in all three of our forums.  (Message) 18:44, February 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * If we're willing to renominate articles, I've made a massive revamp of Seven Great Demon Lords based on the new profile and wikimon's info on it. Please check it out and see what you think. Glorious  CHAOS!  19:46, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

February 20, 2010: MetalPiranimon
MetalPiranimon, with two votes again... I think we need more voters. THB  → Talk ← 21:53, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, Lets try Upamon !-Kazu 13:25, February 14 ,2010
 * Comment: Doesn't use official bio, and doesn't have full appearance listings. Glorious  CHAOS!  08:36, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

MetalPiranimon is complete, so I vote that. Glorious  CHAOS!  08:36, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I second this notion -- Good intetions have created some of the biggest disasters and most horrid things to have ever exsisted 02:51, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

February 13, 2010: Digivolution
Digivolution wins with two votes. Good choice. THB  → Talk ← 15:23, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of the update THB, anyways I nominate the Digivolution article. I think its good for the most part, maybe needs some more info in some areas, but that can be taken care of in a few minutes. -- Good intetions have created some of the biggest disasters and most horrid things to have ever exsisted 02:44, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, seems good. I vouch for it too. Rad140 Message 22:37, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

How about Waspmon?-Kazu 11:29, February 7, 2010

February 2, 2010: Digimon Adventure 02
Digimon Adventure 02 wins with two votes (about time, too). THB  → Talk ← 12:54, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

How about Hookmon?-kazu ,13:04 27,12,2009
 * No. Hookmon is barely put together, and doesn't follow the correct format.

Millenniummon's article has current bios and pics. We need to fill in the card numbering for Moon, and check which video games and v-pets they each appear in. I believe Dawn/Dusk is the main one, so they need to use the correct formatting for the Dawn-Dusk sections (see Dianamon, or SkullGreymon). It should be easy to make these "complete". Glorious  CHAOS!  23:35, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * I work on Millenniummon's article a little later on tonight and spiff it up as per your suggestions -- Good intetions have created some of the biggest disasters and most horrid things to have ever exsisted 01:26, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

I would like to see the Digimon Frontier article featured122.58.111.80 01:59, December 31, 2009 (UTC)
 * Article is very inconsistent. I think several sections need to be deleted altogether (such as "changed in the dub") because they do a half-ish cruddy job. They only detail some of the info and not all. Either the whole thing needs to be detailed (in which sections would be several pages long, which is bad) or the sections need deleting. If they are deleted, then the Frontier article is too short. Only dead fish go with the flow. 06:17, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Since there hasn't been a new featured article for over a month now, I'm voting for Digimon Adventure 02 - the article's in a good state and it hasn't been displayed yet (I'm a bit surprised really). THB  → Talk ← 00:27, January 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll agree with that, I think its time for a new fetured article and Digimon Adventure 02 seems good enough. Unless one of the admins feels that there needs to be somthing done first. -- Good intetions have created some of the biggest disasters and most horrid things to have ever exsisted 03:43, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

Comment: Actually, would anyone mind if I just went and put up Digimon Adventure 02? It's already got two votes, and this really has gone on far too long. THB  → Talk ← 15:56, January 30, 2010 (UTC)