Thread:Rodericky/@comment-134861-20200216190820/@comment-134861-20200220134752

I think you misunderstood. We want the design section to be holistic. That means we want it to cover the entire design of the creature, based on just the creature. We want to avoid a lot of stuff we've seen in the past along the lines of "Bastemon is like LadyDevimon, but with cat features instead of bat features, and also these other exceptions" -- and then leaving out a lot of design details that are actually relevant because they're not "about" how Bastemon is supposedly like LadyDevimon.

If the similarity is a critical, intentional part of the design, like Paildramon being a mashup of ExVeemon and Stingmon, that is of course fair to cover. And it's fine to cover that Halsemon has elements derived from Hawkmon (as long as it's done talking about the design itself, not in-universe plot elements).

But we want to strongly discourage edits picking on non-intentional things, to avoid all the "X is kind of like Y, except for all these differences" fluff that fanwikis tend to accumulate.

"Another thing. Instead of completely blanking them out, you could have just altered and eliminated all holistic and other references from my edits to make it sound neutral."

Well, (1) that's actually a ton of work you're asking me to do, and (2) the goal was to get you to actually respond and amend the editing style. Up until that point, you had not responded on your talk page, and you weren't changing your editing behavior.