DigimonWiki talk:Digivolution References/Other VG

Numemon
The game treates the line as Numemon > GoldNumemon > PlatinumNumemon, so I would consider it as Numemon > GoldNumemon and Numemon >> PlatinumNumemon. 15:31, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

Demon Lords
In regards to Digimon World Data Squad, should the demon lord prior forms be listed as "Sinful human" or "Sinful being"? The original demon lords are created from humans, while the allied demon lords are additional forms of the partner Digimon, bestowed due to the human partners exemplifying the sins. For the latter, it's not clear that the code keys are involved at all. We're not listing these evolutions as direct species > species (ex. Gaomon > Barbamon), but so long as we're crediting the human derivation of the demon lords, it seems reasonable to at least allude to the other methods of manifestation that they exploit. 20:07, November 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm going to go say yes? I'd support the change to the term "being" but I'm hesitant to remove the card altogether until I've rewatched the relevant scenes. Lanate (talk) 02:52, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Otamamon line
For the purposes of infoboxes, do the memorial books and v-tamer character bios overrank Masters? 02:54, March 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ugh, this is kind of weird... I'd put the V-Tamer character bios count as part of the manga, but we usually put games over publications, right? 02:59, March 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * We usually do anime story, manga story, video game story, and then species profiles/card illustrations/etc. This one's, it could be treated as both character and species profiles. 13:07, March 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * True, but we also tend to give video game profiles/lines the same precedence as the video game itself. Lanate (talk) 13:44, March 6, 2014 (UTC)

Collectors
[22:58]  Like, [22:58]  http://res.dmog.bandainamco-ol.jp/130624AM/gra_s/digimon/2055/l.jpg [22:58]  and then subsequent http://res.dmog.bandainamco-ol.jp/130624AM/gra_s/digimon/2057/l.jpg [22:59]  would that be equivalent to the Win Ratio cards, do you think? [22:59]  does the card description specify who it evolves the card to?