Thread:KrytenKoro/@comment-29650373-20191123044544/@comment-29650373-20191125150330

KrytenKoro wrote: First off, the fact that any dictionary expresses that both have that lack of specificity is enough.

Second off, you are the one insisting the word you picked is better. The burden of proof is on you.

Third off, any of them. Including the Japanese ones. That's why the phrase "physical strength" exists, because strength on its own doesn't automatically imply "physical".

"First off, the fact that any dictionary expresses that both have that lack of specificity is enough.": You must have a particular dictionary in mind? Which one?

"Second off, you are the one insisting the word you picked is better. The burden of proof is on you.": Yes, the burden of proof is on me. But not me alone necessarily at all times. With all due respect.

"Third off, any of them. Including the Japanese ones. That's why the phrase "physical strength" exists, because strength on its own doesn't automatically imply 'physical'.": Fair enough but I am still curious about which dictionary you are referring to.