Thread:Rodericky/@comment-134861-20200216190820/@comment-33953066-20200221004921

KrytenKoro wrote: If the similarity is a critical, intentional part of the design, like Paildramon being a mashup of ExVeemon and Stingmon, that is of course fair to cover. And it's fine to cover that Halsemon has elements derived from Hawkmon (as long as it's done talking about the design itself, not in-universe plot elements).

But we want to strongly discourage edits picking on non-intentional things, to avoid all the "X is kind of like Y, except for all these differences" fluff that fanwikis tend to accumulate.

"Another thing. Instead of completely blanking them out, you could have just altered and eliminated all holistic and other references from my edits to make it sound neutral."

Well, (1) that's actually a ton of work you're asking me to do, and (2) the goal was to get you to actually respond and amend the editing style. Up until that point, you had not responded on your talk page, and you weren't changing your editing behavior. No. That's not it. What I'm reading here is that the design was too holistic even if the Digimon's design is directly but unintentionally designed from another form, even I think putting those new edits was ridiculous, but I put them in anyway. But, believe me or not, everyone's got an impulse, what can I tell ya?

If you want a rule specifically for this wiki for newcomer edits, you should put a new one here: Never put too holistic references to Digimon design based on how unintentional they are designed.

And oh, Mr. Admin, I'm not saying you should work yourself to death with altering my or anyone's edits, there are other people who can do it so it looks clean.

And for this reason, my editing style, is why I rarely edit other wikis nowadays. Because to be frank, I don't want my impulse get the best of me.