Talk:Taichi "Tai" Kamiya

Digimon X Arena
We need to cover this somehow. 05:03, December 14, 2010 (UTC)

Hunters
If this Taichi is not the same as Adventure, we'll have to create a "Taichi Yagami (Hunters)" page, right? I'm only asking because there's a chance that they aren't the same Taichi, since they are using the old design instead of the 02 one.G-SANtos 14:48, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * If he's not the same as any of the Adventure continuities, sure. That's pretty unlikely, though; remember that we cover both anime and manga Taiki on his page. 15:35, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * I just though another possibility: He is V-Tamer Taichi. It doesn't seem likely that a manga character appears in the anime, but I've read some of your theories on With the Will forums.
 * However, if he's not the V-Tamer Taichi, or a Hunters version of him, but the same Adventure Taichi and we see Daisuke, them it's bad writing, inconsistecy, plothole, blah blah blah. Unless it's time travel, but that would create some plotholes if he doesn't lose is Hunters memory in the end.
 * Also, if the manga Taiki meets the anime Taiki at any moment, will still be workable to cover both Taikis on the same page?G-SANtos 15:47, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * In that case, I think not. Ironically, by bringing them together it would break the synopsis and clarity apart, so we would need to split them. For a similar example, see Galvatron II on the tfwiki. 19:45, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

Time-Splitting Headers
Is there a reason why those headers were removed? Lanate (talk) 10:56, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * KrytenKoro said we don't use it for same-universe characters. At least it's what I get. 14:36, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you direct me to that statement? I originally split those because, though they're the same universe, they're spread over far different media. Lanate (talk) 18:46, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't find it. Maybe it was on the IRC. I'm gonna ask him to see this. 14:41, January 22, 2012 (UTC)—Correction at 14:42, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * It was in the discussion for Takuya, I think, and it's because the material was being written as if the chronological release of the material was how the character's plotline went, and as if there were two different Takuyas.
 * If the other appearances are non-canon or explicitly a distinct "timeline" of the character, we should put the headers back, but for the central "canon history" of the character, I think that should be kept in a straight thread. If we need to cover stuff like gameplay info in those, that would work too. 11:43, January 23, 2012 (UTC)

Ok how come in relationships the link is a fan link? shouldnt that be removed?

i looked at it and its is not a fan link, so why does it say fan? i skimmed over it and did not read the entire thing.
 * Covering the various relationships is a fandom-based activity, rather than strictly encyclopedic, so it is cordoned off in that section. 01:12, July 28, 2012 (UTC)