Talk:Seraphimon

Deletion of 16:17, December 23, 2012 revision
On the 23rd of December (alternatively Mass of St. Thorlac), I added picture to the article (which I uploaded a few hours earlier, and which contained an unintented typo in its name). This was reverted by KrytenKoro without any further explanation. Even though I have no doubt there was a reason behind this deletion, I believe I deserve an explanation due to my sacred right to make constructive contributions just like everybody else. While I have great respect for KrytenKoro and his work, what annoys me most on Wikias like DigimonWiki is unexplained reversions. I am not looking for an argument, just a simple, brief explanation. --CrappyScrap (talk) 17:28, December 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * By our policy, the only images to be placed in the species pages are the ones that go in the Infobox. Every species article follows this. Anything else should go in the galleries. 17:37, December 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Deviating from the template? Many thanks, I will make sure the same mistake is not done in the future. That's everything I need, have a nice day. --CrappyScrap (talk) 18:23, December 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Moreover, you placed a Digimon Frontier image (which is also misnamed and in the wrong format) in the section for Super Xros Wars Red and Blue. The default assumption is that it was ludicrous to put the image there. 22:42, December 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * My simple intention was to examplify one of Seraphimon's attacks using a picture. I have no idea why the list of attacks is not considered a separate section, but what can be said is that I contributed the picture irrespective of season as Seraphimon's Strike of the Seven Stars is used in both Fusion and Frontier. I am aware of the typo in the file name, but unfortunately I can't access the administrator tools like you and thus find myself unable to fix my little mistake.


 * Unexplained revertions are by customary practice used only to deal with vandalism. I certainly don't consider myself a vandal, even though I may have crossed certain lines on at least one instance. If you expect people to contribute, you have to treat them with respect. In the end, that's all I wanted to say; I consider the revertion itself as unproblematic due the explanation I was given by G-SANtos. As far as I am concerned, we can shake hands and close this discussion for good.


 * Best, CrappyScrap (talk) 00:05, December 26, 2012 (UTC)