Talk:MadLeomon

Untitled
In first episode, MadLeomon absorbed data of his soldiers and changed into another form. Caption visible on screen reads—アームド マッドレオモン (ArmedMadLeomon). Should we add this as his mode/subspecies? Final Cannon  Talk

In the preview he appears in another new form too, with some snake-shaped appendages. I don't know if it is some kind of special ability or a real evolution. Well, I think we should for more info before doing something. Shadow Abyss 00:03, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

The agreement right now is to wait and see what happens. They'll definitely go under "Other Forms" for sure, but we're not sure if they're more powerful evolutions, a mode change, an armour mode, slide evolution, etc etc. Maybe the second episode will shed some more light on this.—— Rad140 (Message) 04:08, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's "Armed MadLeomon" by the way. 04:20, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * In preview of next episode, I think he DigiXros with Orochimon... we will see soon. Final Cannon  Talk
 * He indeed Xros with Orochimon to form MadLeomon (Orochi Mode). However, in next preview he appears in next form. New episode—new form? Final Cannon  Talk
 * Look like he is a recurring villain from the beginning of the series. Shadow Abyss 23:39, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * The Digica Taisen card indicates that "Armed MadLeomon" is still "MadLeomon". At best, it is on the level of attribute/x-antibody variation. 00:58, July 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * But as a variation, we've had worse. It's still a bigger change than, say, Alphamon and Alphamon (Ouryuuken), and it took a while for us to find the latter's name. For me, anyhow, a name-change equals a new section. Lanate (talk) 05:28, July 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * In addition to all that... should we add MadLeomon as a subspecies of Leomon? To me, this guy just looks like a Zombie version of a regular Leomon on a few steroids. Hyperwre_2.0 17:47, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * No. There's no source for that. 20:50, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Armed MadLeomon
Are we changing the name back, now? 02:57, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes. Lanate (talk) 14:29, September 9, 2013 (UTC)