Talk:Digimon Tamers: Runaway Locomon

Great movie and I loved Rika singing. --Mangamolly1991 13:54, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

It was great to see that the digimon tamers were reunited with their digimon, and that almost the entire cast reappeared, but I hated how Henry's dad never got the chance to be forgiven, the monster makers didn't make a single apperance, and most importantly, there was no closer to the movie, AND THUS NO CLOSER TO THE TAMER SEASON!!!!

Continuity
How does this film follow adter message in a packet, if if happened timeline wise before the Cd Drama? This movie happened six months after the end of the series, while the Cd Drama is a Year after the end of the series as it is clearly stated in the Cd drama itself.
 * The title of one track uses "year", yes, but if I remember correctly, it is used metaphorically, and within the actual script, they only say "several months".
 * Even if it does literally say "one year", it would just be considered a plot hole, not an uncanonicity. Without a specific authorial claim, along the lines of "The CD is canon, and anything that contradicts it isn't canon", or "The movie or CD is not canon", then we can't make that call; we assume that all officially published works are canon until told otherwise. 22:06, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok then, so there is doubt weather this movie or the Drama Cd is cannon. Even though I don't have that doubt, since the main writer explains that there are several plot holes and why (i.e., it was released made before the final episode and he was not consulted), which to me declares it non Canon, but anyway. Since Cannonicity (not sure if this is a word, actually) is in dispute, should it not be stated in the main page? Even though it is possible for both to be cannon by making the characters approximatively a year older than expected, the way the page is written now suggests that the movie is proven as Cannon, which later on does lead to confusion. This is even especially notable since the very opposite happened with the prior movie, Battle of Adventures. The article to that movie casts doubt weather or not it is cannon when there isn't much doubt since the devas did arrive before summer vacation (sinduramon even showed up on a school camping trip before the summer), and the events are implied to have transpired by the Tv Series itself.
 * No. Canonicity is not our decision to make. There are plenty of plot holes within the series itself, and we don't try to claim it's non-canon. People tried to claim Battle of Adventurers was non-canon as well, and it was proven to be absolutely canon by the end of the series.
 * Without an explicit statement from the producers claiming that the film is non-canon, then it remains canon in the eyes of this wiki. You are free to list continuity errors, as we do with every episode or chapter or film, but this is not a fan forum, and we don't make those decisions. 02:42, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

You know it would be nice if someone added that Ryo was actually in the digital world unlike all the others, this also adds to the theory of him being actually not from this dimension, and part digital, and thus being able to biomerge without the help of Dobermon, i would like to add the part when he is clearly coming from the digital world, but i don't know how picky you are about changes o this wiki --Doomroar (talk) 03:14, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * That's pretty much 100% speculatory, so no. 19:31, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * I actually just want to add the fact that in the movie he comes/appears from the digital world, nothing more, since we don't really know why he was there and not in the real world. Also this is kinda unrelated but of all the tamers he is the only one that was not shown after Rika's party, it was kinda weird because they even show Locomon running on the digital world, but there is no sign of Ryo anywhere, in neither of the 2 worlds. --Doomroar (talk) 05:17, January 27, 2014 (UTC)