Thread:KrytenKoro/@comment-31140911-20200217193418/@comment-134861-20200218142120

It's not a thing about "ground to stand on". You seem to be approaching this from the angle of "is it more parsimonious than the other options", but I'm trying to explain to you that the wiki doesn't make that a goal in the first place, because Bandai and Toei have made it a lost cause. We do not try to tell the source material what it is.

Flamedramon and Raidramon are used as the ur-examples of why we don't try to detangle "what attack this is really meant to be a dub of" (Angewomon is also a good example, though not why the policy was started). We simply report which English names are used in the same context as the original Japanese names. We don't even link up names that sound similar if they're not used in identical contexts.

The onus is on Bandai/Toei to not leave a mess. If they do, well, we report that. But we don't try to tangle or untangle anything that isn't explicitly stated, especially with attacks.