User talk:M.I.D.S

Welcome
Hi, welcome to DigimonWiki! Thanks for your edit to the Gabumon page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Lanate (Talk) 00:50, July 26, 2010

Gabumon
Stop vandalizing the Gabumon page. He is canonically a Reptile, for crying out loud. 22:41, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

/* Gabumon */
Actually he is not. People have seen the episode 'Subzero Ice Punch' and took stuff into their own hands, without any confirmation. Which is ignorant. Their is no proof or anything to back up the claim that Gabumon is a reptile, especially as he has canine digivolutions. I am simply setting things straight, because I while on Youtube a user asked why Gabumon is a reptile with wolf-digivolutions. Which was a good point, as digivolutions are supposed to be an extenson of the species of the rookie form. And furthermore, Every season their is a rebel child, each time it being a dog like digimon. So no Iw will stop, you stop spreading false information on something that you wouldn't know as you've never speaked with the creators or had confirmation. THANK YOU!!!
 * ....are you serious? Every single card and analyzer calls him a Reptile-type Digimon. His official profile says that the fur is merely a pelt of Garurumon's that he's wearing. There's even official art of him without the pelt, where it's clear he's some sort of lizard. 15:54, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

/* Gabumon */
American dubs mess everything up. I bet the original creators would verify that gabumon is based of off canines.It would make more sense because of his digivolutions. Hum...... but it cool to finally meet someone who is interested in digimon like me.... Can we compromise on the page as gabumon is my favorite digimon
 * It has nothing to do with the dubbers. Gabumon is a Reptile (爬虫類型 Hachuuruigata) Digimon, and always has been. 20:43, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

/* Gabumon */
But you have to take into consideration his design. Including his name derivation, digivolutions, his need for a pelt, and even his stature... They made a honest to goodness mistake and regardless I'm simply pointing it out.