Forum:Character Pages

I'd like to change a couple things about the character pages, mainly because they've been bugging me for a bit. I think I may have originally done some of these changes myself, which kinda makes me pissed off at myself in retrospect, but... Just a few things I'd like to have input on. Lanate (talk) 21:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to change the images from being thumbnails when the description of the image is redundant? Like when you have a subheading that says Beelzemon and then the images says Beelzemon?
 * Barring that, can I at least remove the katakana? They're kinda...  They just increase the length of the description.
 * Can I create a new template for Human characters so we're not having to create aux1, aux2, etc. for people? I'm pretty sure I can modify it so that the Frontier people don't have to have the Digimon template as well.


 * That's all fine with me. Adding to that, I think we should standardize the size of all the images, like perhaps all the ones with articles to themselves (like the Beelzemon page for example) with 375px and all the thumbnailed ones (like Impmon (Tamers) having about... say 150px. In my opinion, it makes the whole articles look better, as there won't be some images being too large (like the AncientGreymon and AncientGarurumon pics) or too small.
 * No problem with the Human characters section as well. I have been meaning to modify the imported templates from Wikipedia for quite a while already. I just got a little... ah, sidetracked. But perhaps we should still keep the Digimon section of the template, as I found it pretty handy at times when I'm in a hurry. - Digi9346 - With each end, comes a new beginning... 15:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I was leaning toward 200 or 250px myself, with 100px for the thumbnails, but I definitely vote for a standardization.


 * And, oops on missing out on the Character Template. Lanate (talk) 07:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Hmm... I have tried out the 100px for the thumbnails and they didn't look so good. I still think that sticking with 150px would be better for it will show more detail. Our aim is mainly to keep it small but we must still make sure that it can be seen. - Digi9346 - With each end, comes a new beginning... 16:45, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * 375px can be way too big, either with the not too good quality images we end up pixellating or the ultra big images we end up blowing up even further. Lanate (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * 200px or 250px will be fine with me. It's just the thumbnails that I think we should enlarge. - Digi9346 - With each end, comes a new beginning... 18:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)