Talk:Starmon

Starmon (2010 anime) > SuperStarmon
Since in episode 63 Starmon states that only the best of Starmon may evolve into Superstarmon in the same vain as Pickmon do to evolve into Starmon (2010 anime), is it safe to write SuperStarmon as an evolution of Starmon (2010 anime)?User:ChaddyFantome
 * It will need to be sourced with a quote, but yes. 00:09, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Bear form?
On 63 all the little Starmon (2010 anime) that were with SuperStarmon fused into a bear. Does it deserve a section like:
 * "Starmon (2010 anime) Bear form" is a fusion (DigiXors?) of many Starmon (2010 anime) turning into a bear-like Digimon. It has not been officially named.
 * Should we count it as a Digimon and add it here? G-SANtos 17:14, December 05, 2011 (UTC)
 * I haven't had a chance to watch the episode, but I heard talk that SuperStarmon called it out as an attack. As such, it would just be an attack. It didn't really seem to be any sort of evolution or digixros to me. 18:32, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Just in case you may want to check, here it is. G-SANtos 23:06, December 05, 2011 (UTC)

Wish Upon a Star
Wish Upon a Star is listed as both a Unison and singular attack for Starmon. According to the DRB, it is Unison. Is the singular version disparate, or is it just not clearly depicted as a unison technique in Fusion? 14:06, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * It's clearly not a unison technique in Fusion. The context is that Starmon attacks, then the Pickmons use their own attack afterward. Lanate (talk) 19:16, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * Would it be fair to treat it as a Starmon-specific attack, then? The original profile just says its a "corps technique", and treating it as Starmon's portion of a one-two punch would seem to still comply with that. 20:08, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure, let's go with that unless something else contradicts. Lanate (talk) 02:49, June 22, 2014 (UTC)