Talk:Mervamon

Just to be clear
by the card say ultimate you mean the original jap meaning perfect right. Not it Says Ultimate meaning Mega.—Ovidkid 07:04, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it says "Kanzentai" (Perfect).192.249.47.165 15:51, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Wouldn't that retroactively make Minervamon an Adult/Champion level since Mervamon is her older form? 93.65.214.168 17:03, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * no, it would not.

Level
The above section says that Level came from a card. Which card is the source? And if we are using card Levels, could we use the cards Levels of Xros Digimon with a note saying that it has no Level in the Digimon Dictionary like we did with Mervamon? G-SANtos 17:29, December 09, 2011 (UTC)
 * Mervamon's Jintrix card explicitly states that Mervamon is a "Perfect" (Ultimate). It is absolutely correct to list the levels gleaned from other cards, though we might be better served by switching "Perfect" with "None", as "None" is the "more official" level for Mervamon and the other Xros Digimon. That would require actually typing "None" in the infobox for any Digimon that is canonically without a level.
 * On that note, I'm not aware of any other Xros Digimon having a level specified by the card games, although Jintrix does organize them loosely based on what level they are similar too. 19:09, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * From what I've heard, OmegaShoutmon, ZekeGreymon and Arresterdramon are listed as "Adult" (Champion) on Jintrix, or at least that's the design they used. I actually searched their card images on the Jintrix site and by the card design Shoutmon, Ballistamon, Cutemon and Spadamon are Child, Dorulumon, Greymon, MailBirdramon, Shoutmon (King), Deckerdramon and DarkKnightmon have Adult card designs, MetalGreymon is Perfect, and the rest I can't remember. G-SANtos 20:41, December 09, 2011 (UTC)
 * They use the designs of Adult/etc. equivalents, yes, but the cards do not actually claim them to be Adults or otherwise. Mervamon is the only one where the card outright says, "This is a Perfect Digimon." 23:08, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * So, it doesn't deserve to be mentioned at all? Okay, I got it. G-SANtos 03:18, December 10, 2011 (UTC)